My concern is that project management is too focused on defining project success as meeting the functional, budgetary, and schedule goals. These goals or project variables are often used to determine the project's success. However, these goals represent success at the operational level of the organization. This simply means the project was executed as planned and does not imply the affect the project had on the organization.
My argument is that a more strategic approach should be used to evaluate a project's success. The value created as a result of the project is more important than the completion of the project. I used the example of a new information systems project that was operationally successful although the new system resulted in a 21% decrease in operating capacity; the organization now processes 21% less than before the system project. This is a decrease in value even though the project would be considered a success. Is it really a success for the organization?
While we cannot ignore the operational project metrics we must do a better job of evaluating and measuring value in our projects. As project managers we should want to make sure our projects are both successfully executed and also generates new value for the organization.